IBM POWER6™ processor-based servers are designed to allow you to get the most out of your IT investment. The combination of leadership performance, energy efficiency, flexible virtualization features and RAS features designed to maximize application availability can enable you to take back control of your IT infrastructure.
Tab navigation
- Overview
- Offerings
- Dare to compare- selected tab,
- Migration path
- Get the facts
Tab navigation
- Overview
- Performance- selected tab,
- Availability
- Efficiency
- Virtualization
Power performance
Compare highend servers
IT managers have to grapple with the issue of server sprawl and the accompanying high cost of management combined with the explosion in energy use in the datacenter. One solution that many clients are implementing is server consolidation. The IBM Power™ 595 server, exploiting IBM PowerVM™ technology, is the epitome of a consolidation server because of its outstanding performance and capacity.
With the fastest processor in the industry, the 5.00GHz POWER6 processor, and outstanding memory and I/O bandwidth, the Power 595 has the capacity to support huge consolidation efforts that other servers just can't handle.
We ran a variety of benchmarks, and the answer is the same for all of them. The 64-core IBM Power™ 595 server outperforms the 128-core HP Integrity Superdome. – more performance with ½ the cores. The 595 also has 90% of the performance of the 256 Sun SPARC Enterprise M9000 – 90% of the performance with ¼ the cores.
The Power 595 server can offer you this fabulous performance for your UNIX® applications.
| TPC-C | SPECint_rate2006 | SPECfp_rate2006 | SPECjbb2005 | 2-tier SAP SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64-core, 32 chip, 128 threads IBM Power 595 | 6,085,166 | 2,080 | 2,110 | 3,435,485 | 35,400 |
| 128-core, 64 chips, 256 threads HP Integrity Superdome | 4,092,799 | 1,650 | 1,480 | 2,054,864 | 30,000 |
| 64-core, 32 chip, 128 threads HP Integrity Superdome | 824 | 745 | No Benchmark | 9,265 | |
| 256-core, 64 chips, 512 threads Sun SPARC Enterprise M9000 | 2,290 | No Benchmark | No Benchmark | 39,100 | |
| 128-core Sun SPARC Enterprise M9000 | 1,290 | 1,230 | No Benchmark | No Benchmark | |
| 64-core Sun SPARC Enterprise M9000 | 650 | 636 | No Benchmark | No Benchmark |
The 64-core Power 595 server outperformed the 64-core HP Integrity Superdome server by at least 2 ½ to 1 and the 64-core Sun SPARC Enterprise M9000 server by over 3 to 1 on processor intensive benchmarks. Even when the Superdome and M9000 servers were tested with twice the number of cores, the Power 595 server was faster by 18% up to as much as 71%. 71% faster than a system with double the cores is a very impressive result, but that is what you can expect form the IBM Power 595 server, very impressive results.
These benchmarks show the outstanding systems performance of the Power 595, but sometimes overall systems performance is not the most important factor, especially in a consolidated environment. Some applications are more bound by memory constraints, either based on the quantity of memory available or the memory bandwidth. Others are constrained by I/O bandwidth. When we compare those characteristics, the Power 595 is equally impressive.
| Memory & I/O Characteristics 2 | IBM Power 595 | HP Superdome | Sun M9000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 64 | 128 | 128 |
| Memory (GB) | 4096 | 2048 | 2048 |
| Memory Bandwidth (GB/s) | 1376 | 273.1 | 737 |
| I/O Bandwidth (GB/s) | 640 | 172.8 | 234 |
| Memory (GB) per core | 64 | 16 | 16 |
| Memory Bandwidth (GB/s) per core | 21.50 | 2.13 | 5.76 |
| I/O Bandwidth (GB/s) per core | 10.00 | 1.35 | 1.83 |
Besides delivering two times the processor performance per core, the Power 595 also supports 4 times the memory per core, over 3 ½ times the memory bandwidth per core and over 5 times the I/O bandwidth per core of the Integrity Superdome and the M9000 highend systems. The tremendous capacity of the IBM Power 595 server can help you run challenging applications in every partition.
The Power 595 server is the fastest system with the fastest processor, the most memory capability, and I/O bandwidth. It is no wonder that it is a prime target for highly consolidated environments.
Compare midrange servers
The workhorse UNIX® database and application servers have to deliver cost effective, reliable performance for mission-critical applications. Using advanced features like virtualization, IBM POWER6™ processor performance, and mainframe-inspired reliability, availability, and serviceability (RAS) characteristics, the IBM Power™ 570 server epitomizes what today's midrange server should be.
The POWER6 processor technology and advanced system design of the Power 570 server create a system with leadership-balanced performance. The very fast processor, up to 5.00 GHz, with system bus, I/O bandwidth, and large memory capacity that grows with the number of processors leads to the astounding performance proven by the number of leadership commercial and technical benchmarks.
The result is the very best performance for a midrange server, and the very best performance per core of a midrange server.
We compare performance because the exceptional speed of the Power 570 system is what allows you to meet your end user's service level objectives. And this is designed to be done with fewer cores which helps drive down your cost and improve system manageability.
The following table summarizes the best midrange server performance result for the IBM Power 570 server versus Sun and HP 32-core and 64-core midrange UNIX servers. The results show that the Power 570 server has the very best performance of any midrange server.
| TPC-C | SPECint_rate2006 | SPECfp_rate2006 | SPECjbb2005 | 2-tier SAP SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32-core IBM Power 570 | No Benchmark | 832 | 602 | 1,390,087 | 14,432 |
| 16-core IBM Power 570 | 1,616,162 | 542 | 544 | 867,989 | 8,000 |
| 32-core HP Integrity rx8640 | No Benchmark | 416 | 371 | No Benchmark | No Benchmark |
| 64-core Sun SPARC Enterprise M8000 | No Benchmark | 637 | 582 | 817,158 | No Benchmark |
| 32-core Sun SPARC Enterprise M8000 | No Benchmark | 352 | 333 | 395,989 | 7,300 |
The Power 570 server leads competitive midrange systems in capacity by far. However that is only one measure of performance. Better performance per core helps drive cost savings in hardware acquisition, software licensing, and a variety of operational areas. The following table shows the Power 570 server performance per core compared to Sun and HP midrange servers.
| TPC-C | SPECint_rate 2006 | SPECfp_rate 2006 | SPECjbb 2005 | 2-tier SAP SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32-core, 16 chips, 64 threads IBM Power 570 | No Benchmark | 26 | 19 | 43,440 | 451 |
| 16-core, 8 chips, 32 threads IBM Power 570 | 101,010 | 34 | 34 | 54,249 | 500 |
| 32-core, 16 chips, 64 threads HP Integrity rx8640 | No Benchmark | 13 | 12 | No Benchmark | No Benchmark |
| 64-core, 16 chips, 128 threads Sun SPARC Enterprise M8000 | No Benchmark | 10 | 9 | 12,768 | No Benchmark |
| 32-core, 16 chip, 64 threads Sun SPARC Enterprise M8000 | No Benchmark | 11 | 10 | 12,375 | 228 |
With performance per core more than double the midrange competitors, the Power 570 server can enable you to reduce the number of servers and/or the size of servers you require to do your production. Consolidation using the PowerVM™ feature of the Power 570 server can also help you increase the utilization of your servers which could enable you to even further reduce servers.
Processing power is not the only resource required by applications. So other resource is also required for consolidation. The 570 has that resource. On a per-core basis, the 5.00 GHz 16-core 570 has three times the memory, over seven times the memory bandwidth, and more than two times the I/O bandwidth of HP, and four times the memory, over 5 times the memory bandwidth, and over four times the I/O bandwidth of Sun. The 4.20GHz 32-core Power 570, optimized for space and energy efficiency, still has more capacity per core than the rx8640 and M8000.
| IBM Power 570 | HP rx8640 | Sun M8000 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 16 | 32 | 32 | 64 |
| Memory (GB) | 768 | 768 | 512 | 512 |
| Memory Bandwidth (GB/s) | 256 | 256 | 68 | 184 |
| I/O Bandwidth (GB/s) | 66.7 | 56 | 48 | 61 |
| Memory (GB) per core | 48 | 24 | 16 | 8 |
| Memory Bandwidth (GB/s) per core | 16 | 8 | 2.13 | 2.88 |
| I/O Bandwidth (GB/s) per core | 3.9125 | 1.75 | 1.50 | 0.95 |
This combination of more performance per core and more I/O and memory capacity and bandwidth per core could allow you to reduce the number of servers or the number of cores per server. This could have a major impact on lowering your cost of server acquisition and your total cost of ownership for your IT environment.
The midrange also has systems with less configuration and performance capability. The Power 560 Express has the same advantages in this space as the Power 570 has in its space with 45 to 80% performance advantage versus HP systems with the same number of cores and 17 to 37% performance advantage versus Sun systems that have twice the number of cores. The 560 Express also has tremendous advantage in bandwidth with 8 times the memory bandwidth of the HP Integrity rx7640 and the Sun SPARC Enterprise M5000.
| SPECint_rate2006 | SPECfp_rate2006 | SPECjbb2005 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16-core IBM Power 560 Express | 363 | 263 | 593,904 |
| 16-core HP Integrity rx7640 | 201 | 181 | No Benchmark |
| 32-core Sun SPARC Enterprise M5000 | 264 | 223 | No Benchmark |
| SPECint_rate2006 | SPECfp_rate2006 | SPECjbb2005 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16-core IBM Power 560 Express | 23 | 16 | 37,119 |
| 16-core HP Integrity rx7640 | 13 | 11 | No Benchmark |
| 32-core Sun SPARC Enterprise M5000 | 8 | 7 | No Benchmark |
| IBM Power 560 | HP rx7640 | Sun M5000 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 16 | 16 | 32 |
| Memory (GB) | 384 | 256 | 256 |
| Memory Bandwidth (GB/s) | 128 | 32 | 64 |
| I/O Bandwidth (GB/s) | 24 | 23 | 16 |
| Memory (GB) per core | 24 | 16 | 8 |
| Memory Bandwidth (GB/s) per core | 8 | 2 | 2 |
| I/O Bandwidth (GB/s) per core | 1.5 | 1.4375 | 0.5 |
The IBM Power Systems midrange servers are designed to support today’s data center. They have the performance, capacity, and bandwidth to support multi-application consolidated environments to help you control cost of operation and acquisition of your environment.
Compare Entry Servers
As entry servers become faster, more customers find them the right performance for mission-critical applications. They also are often the right servers for distributed applications in stores and branch banks. The same POWER6 technology that makes the Power 570 the fastest midrange server helps make the IBM Power 550 Express system the fastest UNIX entry server. The comparison to the 8-core HP Integrity rx6600 and the 16-core Sun SPARC Enterprise M4000 servers help demonstrate this. In fact, the Power 550 Express server has such excellent performance that its result for the demanding TPC-C benchmark is even better than the best HP 9000 Superdome result ever posted. 9
| TPC-C | SPECint_rate 2006 | SPECfp_rate 2006 | SPECjbb 2005 | 2-tier SAP SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Power 550 Express | 629,159 | 213 | 178 | 350,642 | 3,104 |
| HP Integrity rx6600 | 372,140 | 102 | 71 | 158,174 | 2,150 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M4000 | No Benchmark | 135 | 112 | No Benchmark | No Benchmark |
The advantage of the Power 550 Express server is even more evident when you look at performance per core.
| TPC-C | SPECint_rate 2006 | SPECfp_rate 2006 | SPECjbb 2005 | 2-tier SAP SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Power 550 Express (8 cores, 4chips, 16 threads) | 78,645 | 27 | 22 | 43,830 | 388 |
| HP Integrity rx6600 (8 cores, 4chips, 16 threads) | 46,518 | 13 | 9 | 19,772 | 269 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M4000 (16 cores, 4 chips, 32 threads) | No Benchmark | 8 | 7 | No Benchmark | No Benchmark |
Like its highend and midrange counterparts, the Power 550 Express also has significantly greater memory and I/O bandwidth per core than the HP and Sun systems. The 550 is also designed to support consolidated environments.
| IBM Power 550 | HP rx6600 | Sun M4000 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 | 16 |
| Memory (GB) | 256 | 384 | 128 |
| Memory Bandwidth (GB/s) | 128 | 17 | 32 |
| I/O Bandwidth (GB/s) | 14 | 9.8 | 8 |
| Memory (GB) per core | 32 | 48 | 8 |
| Memory Bandwidth (GB/s) per core | 16 | 2.125 | 2 |
| I/O Bandwidth (GB/s) per core | 1.75 | 1.225 | 0.5 |
Compare Blade Servers
Blade servers have become increasing popular because of their outstanding performance efficiency. Performance per rack unit (u) and performance per WATT advantage of blades has caused a movement from rack servers to blades. The performance of POWER6 processors has helped the IBM BladeCenter JS22 to be the leader among RISC and Itanium blade servers in these metrics.
| System Name | Peak / Core | Peak / u | Peak / WATT |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM BladeCenter JS22 (4.0 GHz, 4 core) | 21.18 | 131.76 | 0.41 |
| IBM BladeCenter JS12 Express (3.8 GHz, 2 core, RedHat) | 22.95 | 71.40 | 0.22 |
| HP Integrity BL860c (1.60GHz/18MB Dual-Core Intel Itanium 2) | 11.60 | 37.12 | 0.14 |
| Sun Blade 6000 | 10.48 | 83.80 | 0.30 |
| Sun Blade T6320 | 10.69 | 85.50 | 0.31 |
1 Competitive benchmark results reflect results published as of October 7, 2008. The results are the best IBM Power 595 64-core server result, the best 256-core Sun SPARC Enterprise M9000 server results and the best 128-core HP Integrity Superdome results. Cells were left blank if there is no posted result for the benchmark. The TPC-C results can be found at www.tpc.org. The SPECint_rate2006, SPECfp_rate2006 and SPECjbb2005 results can be found at www.spec.org. The SAP SD 2-tier results can be found at www.sap.com.
TPC-C results as of October 7, 2008. Source: http://www.tpc.org.
| System | Chip/Core/ Thread | Systems Availability | $/tpmC | Database | OS | tpmC | tpmC/Core |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Power 595 (5.00 GHz POWER6) | 32/64/128 | 12/10/08 | $2.81 | IBM DB2 9.5 | AIX V5.3 | 6,085,166 | 95,080 |
| HP Superdome (1.60 GHz Itanium 2) | 64/128/256 | 08/06/07 | $2.93 | Oracle 10g | HP-UX 11i v3 | 4,092,799 | 31,975 |
SPEC® and the benchmark names SPECrate®, SPECint®, and SPECjbb® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. For the latest SPEC benchmark results, visit http://www.spec.org
| System Name | Cores | Chips | Cores / Chip | Threads / Core | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Power 595 (5.00 GHz, 64 core) | 64 | 32 | 2 | 2 | 1820 |
| HP Integrity Superdome (1.60GHz/24MB Dual-Core Intel Itanium 2) | 128 | 64 | 2 | 1 | 1530 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M9000 | 256 | 64 | 4 | 2 | 2090 |
| System Name | Cores | Chips | Cores / Chip | Threads / Core | Base | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Power 595 | 64 | 32 | 2 | 2 | 1820 | 2110 |
| HP Integrity Superdome | 128 | 64 | 2 | 1 | 1420 | 1480 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M9000 | 256 | 64 | 4 | 2 | 1860 | 2010 |
| HW System Name | JVM Instances | Cores | Chips | HW Threading | bops | bops/JVM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Power 595 (5.00 GHz, 64 core) | 32 | 64 | 32 | Yes | 3435485 | 107359 |
| HP Integrity SD64B Server | 32 | 128 | 64 | No | 2054864 | 64215 |
SAP performance of highend servers from IBM, Sun, and HP. All results published as of October 7, 2008.
| Number of Benchmark Users | Operating System | ERP Release | Central Server | Chips | Cores | Threads | Technology | GHz | Certificate Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35400 | 30000 | 6.0 (2005) | IBM Power 595 | 32 | 64 | 128 | POWER6 | 5 | 2008019 |
| 39100 | Solaris 10 | 6.0 (2005) | *SPARC Enterprise Server M9000 | 64 | 256 | 512 | SPARC64 VII | 2.52 | 2008042 |
| 30000 | HP-UX 11iV3 | 2005 | HP Integrity SD64B | 64 | 128 | 265 | Dual-Core Intel Itanium 2 9050 | 1.60 | 2006089 |
For full details on these and other SAP benchmarks, see SAP SD Standard Application Benchmark Results, Two-Tier Internet Configuration at http://www.sap.com/solutions/benchmark/sd2tier.epx
2 Comparisons between the IBM Power™ 595 server, the HP Integrity Superdome Server and the Sun SPARC Enterprise M9000 server. System data for HP from the HP Superdome Datasheet available at www.hp.com. System data for Sun from the Sun SPARC Enterprise M9000 Datasheet available at www.sun.com. Data is current as of October 7, 2008.
3 Competitive benchmark results reflect results published as of October 7, 2008. The results are the best IBM Power 570 16-core server result, the best Sun SPARC Enterprise M8000 server 32- and 64-core results, and the best HP Integrity rx8640 server 32-core result. Cells were left blank if there is no posted result for the benchmark. The TPC-C results can be found at www.tpc.org. The SPECint_rate2006, SPECfp_rate2006 and SPECjbb2005 results can be found at www.spec.org. The SAP SD 2-tier results can be found at www.sap.com.
SPEC® and the benchmark names SPECrate®, SPECint®, and SPECjbb® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. For the latest SPEC benchmark results, visit http://www.spec.org
The TPC-C results for the top of the midrange are:
| * Hardware Vendor | System | tpmC | Price/tpmC | System Availability | Date Submitted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | IBM Power 570 | 1,616,162 | 3.54 US $ | 11/21/07 | 05/21/07 |
The IBM Power 570 has 8-processor chips, 16-cores, and 2-threads per core.
TPC-C results as of October 7, 2008. Source: http://www.tpc.org
The SPECint_rate2006 results for the top of the midrange are:
| System Name | Cores | Chips | Cores / Chip | Threads / Core | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Power 570 (4.20GHz, 32 core) | 32 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 832 |
| IBM Power 570 (5.00GHz, 16 core) | 16 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 542 |
| HP Integrity rx8640 (1.60GHz/24MB Dual-Core Intel Itanium 2) | 32 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 416 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M8000 | 64 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 637 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M8000 | 32 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 352 |
SPECfpRate_2006 results for the top of the midrange are:
| System Name | Cores | Chips | Cores / Chip | Threads / Core | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Power 570 (4.20GHz, 32 core) | 32 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 832 |
| IBM Power 570 (5.00GHz, 16 core) | 16 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 542 |
| HP Integrity rx8640 (1.60GHz/24MB Dual-Core Intel Itanium 2) | 32 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 416 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M8000 | 64 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 637 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M8000 | 32 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 352 |
The SPECjbb2005 results for the top of the midrange are:
| HW System Name | JVM Instances | Cores | Chips | HW Threading | bops | bops/JVM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Power 570 (4.20GHz, 32 core) | 16 | 32 | 16 | Yes | 1,390,087 | 86,880 |
| IBM Power 570 (5.00GHz, 16 core) | 8 | 16 | 8 | Yes | 867,989 | 108,499 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M8000 | 16 | 64 | 16 | Yes | 817,158 | 51,072 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M8000 | 16 | 32 | 16 | No | 440,207 | 27,513 |
The SAP SD 2-tier results for the top of the midrange are:
| Number of Benchmark Users | Operating System | ERP Release | Central Server | Chips | Cores | Threads | Technology | GHz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14432 | AIX 6.1 | 16 | IBM Power 570 | 16 | 32 | 64 | POWER6 | 4.20 | 2008057 |
| 8000 | AIX 5.3 | 6.0 (2005) | IBM Power 570 | 8 | 46 | 32 | POWER6 | 4.7 | 2007039 |
| 7300 | Solaris 10 | 16 | Sun SPARC Enterprise M8000 | 16 | 32 | 65 | SPARC64 VI | 2.4 | 2007026 |
The SAP certification number was not available at press time and can be found at www.sap.com/benchmark.
For full details on these and other SAP benchmarks, see SAP SD Standard Application Benchmark Results, Two-Tier Internet Configuration at http://www.sap.com/solutions/benchmark/sd2tier.epx
4 The midrange systems performance per core is calculated by dividing the values in the midrange systems performance table by the number of cores in each benchmarked system. The number of cores for each result is shown in the tables in footnote 3.
5 Comparisons between the IBM Power 570, HP rx8640, and Sun SPARC Enterprise M8000: HP rx8640 data from Intel Itanium-based midrange servers from HP—The HP Integrity rx7640 and rx8640 Servers white paper at http://h71028.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/5982-9681en.pdf?jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN on October 7, 2008. System data for Sun from the Sun SPARC Enterprise M8000 Tech Specs available at www.sun.com. Data is current as of October 7, 2008.
6 Competitive benchmark results reflect results published as of October 7, 2008. The results are the best IBM Power 560 16-core server result, the best Sun SPARC Enterprise M5000 server 32-core results, and the best HP Integrity rx7640 server 16-core result. Cells were left blank if there is no posted result for the benchmark.. The SPECint_rate2006, SPECfp_rate2006 and SPECjbb2005 results can be found at www.spec.org. midrange
SPECint_rate2006 results are:
| System Name | Cores | Chips | Cores / Chip | Threads / Core | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Power 560 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 363 |
| HP Integrity rx7640 (1.60GHz/18MB Dual-Core Intel Itanium 2) | 16 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 201 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M5000 | 32 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 264 |
SPECfp_rate2006 results are:
| System Name | Cores | Chips | Cores / Chip | Threads / Core | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Power 560 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 263 |
| HP Integrity rx7640 (1.60GHz/18MB Dual-Core Intel Itanium 2) | 16 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 181 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M5000 | 32 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 223 |
SPECjbb2005 results are:
| HW System Name | JVM Instances | Cores | Chips | HW Threading | bops | bops/JVM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Power 560 | 8 | 32 | 16 | Yes | 593,904 | 74,238 |
7 The midrange systems performance per core is calculated by dividing the values in the midrange systems performance table by the number of cores in each benchmarked system. The number of cores for each result is shown in the tables in footnote 6.
8 Comparisons between the IBM Power 560, HP rx7640, and Sun SPARC Enterprise M5000: HP rx7640 data from Intel Itanium-based midrange servers from HP—The HP Integrity rx7640 and rx8640 Servers white paper at http://h71028.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/5982-9681en.pdf?jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN on October 7, 2008. System data for Sun from the Sun SPARC Enterprise M5000 Tech Specs available at www.sun.com. Data is current as of October 7, 2008.
9 Comparison of IBM Power 550 Express and HP
TPC-C results are:
| System | Processor Chips | Cores | Threads | tpmC | Price/tpmC | System Availability | Date Submitted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP Superdome – PA-RISC/875 MHz | 64 | 64 | 64 | 541,674 | 11.66 US $ | 01/30/04 | 07/30/03 |
| IBM Power 550 Express | 4 | 8 | 16 | 629,159 | 2.49 US $ | 4/20/2008 | 03/20/08 |
TPC-C results as of October 7, 2008. Source: http://www.tpc.org
10 Competitive benchmark results reflect results published as of October 7, 2008. The results are the best IBM Power 560 16-core server result, the best Sun SPARC Enterprise M5000 server 32-core results, and the best HP Integrity rx7640 server 16-core result. Cells were left blank if there is no posted result for the benchmark.. The SPECint_rate2006, SPECfp_rate2006 and SPECjbb2005 results can be found at www.spec.org. midrange
TPC-C results for entry systems are:
| System | Processor Chips | Cores | Threads | tpmC | Price/tpmC | System Availability | Date Submitted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP Integrity rx6600 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 372,140 | 1.81 US $ | 6/11/2007 | 06/11/07 |
| IBM Power 550 Express | 4 | 8 | 16 | 629,159 | 2.49 US $ | 4/20/2008 | 03/20/08 |
TPC-C results as of October 7, 2008. Source: http://www.tpc.org
SPECint_rate2006 results are:
| System Name | Cores | Chips | Cores / Chip | Threads / Core | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Power 550 (4.20 GHz, 8 core) | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 213 |
| HP Integrity rx6600 (1.60GHz/24MB Dual-Core Intel Itanium 2) | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 102 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M4000 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 135 |
SPECfp_rate2006 results are:
| System Name | Cores | Chips | Cores / Chip | Threads / Core | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Power 550 (4.20 GHz, 8 core) | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 178 |
| HP Integrity rx6600 (1.60GHz/24MB Dual-Core Intel Itanium 2) | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 71.4 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M4000 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
112 |
SPECjbb2005 results are:
| HW System Name | JVM Instances | Cores | Chips | HW Threading | bops | bops/JVM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Power 550 (4.20 GHz, 8 core) | 4 | 8 | 4 | Yes | 350642 | 87661 |
| HP Integrity rx6600 Server | 4 | 8 | 4 | Yes | 158174 | 39544 |
SAP SD 2-tier results are:
| Number of Benchmark Users | Operating System | ERP Release | Central Server | Chips | Cores | Threads | Technology | GHz | Certificate Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3104 | RedHat Enterprise Linux 5 | 6.0 (2005) | IBM Power 550 | 4 | 8 | 16 | POWER6 | 4.20 | 2008002 |
| 2150 | HP-UX 11iV3 | 2005 | HP Integrity rx6600 | 4 | 8 | 16 | Dual-Core Intel Itanium 2 9050 | 1.60 | 2006083 |
11 The entry systems performance per core is calculated by dividing the values in the midrange systems performance table by the number of cores in each benchmarked system. The number of cores for each result is shown in the tables in footnote 9.
12 Comparisons between the IBM Power 550, HP rx6600, and Sun SPARC Enterprise M4000: HP rx6600 data from HP Integrity rx6600 Server Specifications at http://h20341.www2.hp.com/integrity/cache/392325-0-0-0-121.html?jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN on October 7, 2008. System data for Sun from the Sun SPARC Enterprise M4000 Tech Specs available at www.sun.com. Data is current as of July 24, 2008.
13 Competitive benchmark results reflect results published as of October 7, 2008. The results are the best IBM BladeCenter JS22 and JS12 results, the best Sun Blade server results using SPARC based blade servers, and the best HP Blade Server results using Itanium based blade servers.. The SPECint_rate2006 results which can also be found at www.spec.org. midrange are:
| System Name | Base Copies | Cores | Chips | Cores / Chip | Threads / Core | Base | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM BladeCenter JS22 (4.0 GHz, 4 core) | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 77.8 | 84.7 |
| IBM BladeCenter JS12 Express (3.8 GHz, 2 core, RedHat) | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 41.2 | 45.9 |
| HP Integrity BL860c (1.60GHz/18MB Dual-Core Intel Itanium 2) | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 43.9 | 46.4 |
| Sun Blade 6000 | 630 | 80 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 752 | 838 |
| Sun Blade T6320 | 63 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 76.4 | 85.5 |



