(1) Source: Three month return on investment obtained by using the IBM System x Consolidation tool involving a scenario moving from (50) IBM x Series x366 servers to (2) System x3850 X5 servers. The resulting ROI is obtained by using a cumulative of savings based on hardware , power, facility, and software cost savings. You can access the IBM System x Consolidation tool here: https://roianalyst.alinean.com/stgi/ (link resides outside of ibm.com)
(2) Source: Transaction performance is based on results on the TPC-C benchmark as of April 20, 2010. Source: Transaction Processing Performance Council, www.tpc.org as of April 20, 2010.
Check the TPC-C Benchmark Results table
(4) Source: Performance based on best SPECint_rate2006 for Sun SPARC64-VII 2-32 core, Sun SPARC CMT 32-core servers as of March 23, 2009.
| System Name | Base | Processor | Results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copies | Enabled Cores | Enabled Chips | Cores / Chips | Threads / Core | Base | Peak | |
| IBM Power 520 Express | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 125 | ||
| IBM Power 550 Express | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 265 | ||
| HP Integrity rx7640 (1.6 GHz/18MB Dual-Core Intel Itanium 2) | 16 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 186 | 201 |
| HP Integrity rx6600 (1.6 GHz/24MB Dual-Core Intel Itanium 2) | 8 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 94.7 | 102 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M4000 | 32 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 118 | 135 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M5000 | 63 | 32 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 232 | 264 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 | 255 | 32 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 270 | 301 |
| Sun SPARC Enterprise M3000 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 36.9 | 40.8 |
- One Power 550 Express server.
- List Price of $161,596.
- Maximum energy requirement of 1,500 Watts.
- Five M4000 servers.
- List price of $571,900.
- Maximum energy requirement of 10,080 Watts.
- Prices are based on IBM analysis of list price for systems including UNIX® operating system and virtualization, three years of HW maintenance and SW support and subscriptions.
- Prices are subject to change without notice. Prices from resellers may vary. Prices current as of April 7, 2009.
- Energy and cooling costs based on maximum energy requirement for each system. Sun data available in the Servers Site Planning Guide for each system. These can be found at www.sun.com. Average Retail Price of Electricity to Ultimate Customers: Total by End-Use Sector, February 13, 2009 shows average price for commercial customers of $.1024/KWh http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/table5_3.html (link resides outside of ibm.com). All data current as of March 23, 2009. Cooling costs estimated to be 50% of the energy costs of the systems.
(5) Source:
- The number of IBM BladeCenter JS22 servers required to replace 180 Sun Fire V490 was calculated based on SPECint_rate2006 results and estimated utilization rates for non-virtualized and virtualized environments.
- The V490 SPECint_rate2006 result is for a 2.1 GHz system with 4 chips and 2 cores per chip. It has a result of 78.0. The V490 result can be found at www.spec.org (link resides outside of ibm.com). It is current as of October 23, 2007. The JS22 result for the same benchmark is for a 4.0 GHz system with 2 chips and 2 cores per chip. It has a result of 84.7. That result was submitted on November 6, 2007. It will also be posted on www.spec.org (link resides outside of ibm.com).
- The cumulative capacity of these servers is estimated to be the SPECint_rate2006 result for one server multiplied by the number of servers. The calculation shows the cumulative capacity of the 56 JS22 servers is > than the cumulative capacity of the 60 V490 servers at equal utilization. A virtualization factor of 3X was applied to the virtualization scenario using utilizations derived from studies conducted by Alinean available at http://www.ibm.com/services/us/cio/optimize/opt_wp_ibm_systemp.pdf (PDF, 74.41KB). That is the utilization rate for the non-virtualized capacity of the V490 is estimated to be 20% and the utilization rate for the virtualized capacity of the JS22 is estimated to be 60%. The used V490 capacity is therefore estimated as 180 *78 * 20% = 2,808. The JS22 used capacity is estimated as 56 * 84.7 * 60% = 2,845.92. Therefore the cumulative capacity of the 56 JS22 servers at 60% is > than the cumulative capacity of the 180 V490 servers at 20% utilization.
- Sun Fire V490 Maximum AC power consumption of 1,750 WATTs was sourced from Sun Fire™ V490/V890 Servers with UltraSPARC IV+, 2100MHz CPU/Memory Modules Supplement available at http://dlc.sun.com/pdf//820-0714-10/820-0714-10.pdf (link resides outside of ibm.com) (PDF, 51.88KB) as of October 23, 2007. The IBM BladeCenter JS22 maximum power requirement is 5,544 WATTs per fully configured BladeCenter H Chassis with 14 fully configured JS22 servers and all chassis features included based on BladeCenter and System x Power Configurator. Energy usage in the table below was based on average use of 60% of maximum energy usage.
- The Sun Fire V490 size, 5u, is in the Sun Fire V490 Technical Specifications, available at http://www.sun.com/servers/midrange/v490/specs.xml (link resides outside of ibm.com) as of October 23, 2007.
Energy cost of $.096 per kWh estimated based on Energy Information Agency, Table 2: US Energy Nominal Prices, October 9, 2007 available at http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/cfapps/STEO_Query/steotables.cfm?
periodType=Annual&startYear=2004&startMonth=1&endYear=
2008&endMonth=12&tableNumber=8 (link resides outside of ibm.com).
Air conditioning power requirement estimated at 50% of system power requirement. Source: “6 things you can do now to fight power and cooling problems”, June 27, 2006 article in Computerworld available at http://play.tm/wire/click/1025191 (link resides outside of ibm.com). - Purchase price of the JS22 List Price in USD as of November 6, 2007. Price is $9,828 for a 16GB JS22 and $4,234 for the BladeCenter H. Prices are subject to change without notice.
- Datacenter floor space cost was estimated as of 5/3/2007 based on Alinean, Inc.’s ROI Analyst software. The reduction, if any, in floor space, power, cooling and software costs depends on the specific client, environment, application requirements, and the consolidation potential.
(6) Source: Intel. Selling eX4 and Xeon MP in 2009: Special Focus on MP vs. DP. Kennedy Brown & Bryce Olson, Intel Xeon MP Marketing; Sudip Chahal, Intel Principle Engineer; Karl Mailman, Intel ERP Infrastructure Architect; Bob Zuber, IBM eX4 Marketing. 2009
(7) Source: http://www.ibm.com/systems/migratetoibm/systems/storage/svc.html
(8) Source : http://www.ibm.com/systems/migratetoibm/systems/x/compare2.html
(9) Source : http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-aix61mobility/
(10) Source: Impact of IBM System p Server Virtualization,” Transforming the IT Value Equation with POWER6 Architecture. International Technology Group, 05/2007.
(11) Source: “UNIX, Linux Uptime and Reliability Increase; Patch Management Woes Plague Windows” © 2008 Yankee Group Research.
(12) Source : Product delays and detours documented in the following links: CNet News.com, August 31, 2006, Sun scras low–end “Serrano” SPARC chip, http://news.com.com/Sun+scraps+low-end+Serrano+Sparc+chip/2100–1006_3–6111456.html
(link resides outside of ibm.com)
CNet News.com, February 17, 2005, Sun bumps back Opteron servers, http://news.com.com/Sun+bumps+back+Opteron+servers/2100–1010_3–5579889.html?
tag=nl (link resides outside of ibm.com)
CNet News.com, April 9, 2004, Sun kills Ultra SPARC V, Gemini chips, http://news.com.com/Sun+kills+UltraSparc+V%2C+Gemini+chips/2100–1006_3–
5189458.html?tag=nl (link resides outside of ibm.com)
(13) Source: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/06/sun_servers_2008/ (link resides outside of ibm.com)
(14) Source : The Sageza Group, Competitive Snapshot, July 5, 2006, The Future of the High–Volume Server Ecosystem Linux or Solaris 10: Which will Challenge Windows?, page 10: “Linux and Windows each have at least four times the market penetration of Solaris 10 on x86, with a solid plurality if not majority. Despite Sun taking Solaris from SPARC to lower–cost x86 platforms, customers still do not appear to view Solaris 10 as either a high–volume or strategic platform. Given Sun’s declining market share, it is difficult to envision Solaris 10 as a high–volume server platform, especially on x86 hardware…” http://www.sageza.com/available/Snapshot/CompSN%207–5–06
%20OSDL%20Linux%20Ecosystem.pdf (PDF, 87.4KB) (link resides outside of ibm.com).
(15) Source: The Sageza Group, Competitive Snapshot, July 5, 2006, The Future of the High–Volume Server Ecosystem Linux or Solaris 10: Which will Challenge Windows? Figure 3, page 7 (Based on a survey of 202 IT professionals, over 75% have already migrated or have plans to migrate infrastructure applications to Linux).
http://www.sageza.com/available/Snapshot/CompSN%207–5–06
%20OSDL%20Linux%20Ecosystem.pdf (PDF, 87.4KB) (link resides outside of ibm.com)
(16) Source: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/linux/pdfs/RFG-IBM_Linux_vs_Solaris.pdf (PDF, 228.86KB)
